Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FootactionFootaction
VS
MCMC
Footaction

Footaction

New York City, 10001, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.footaction.com/
772/1000Fair

Footaction is a subsidiary of Foot Locker. We live at the intersection of sports and style to serve those who are steps ahead of the latest trends. We offer looks that include the newest releases, exclusive apparel collections, and some of the biggest names in sportswe...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:611
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MC

MC

Rua João Mendonça 529, Senhora da Hora, Porto, PT, 4460-282

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://mc.sonae.pt/
795/1000Fair

MC is a company from the SONAE group, and is a leader in the food retail industry in Portugal. We are a company made by all, to all. With a history of over 35 years of continuous growth, MC has a distinctive positioning in different business areas, with a vast portfoli...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,112
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Footaction

Footaction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MC

MC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Footaction in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Footaction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Footaction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Footaction

Footaction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MC

MC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Footaction company and MC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Footaction and MC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Footaction and MC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Footaction or MC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Footaction or MC ?
Between Footaction and MC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Footaction and MC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8