Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Foodbuy USAFoodbuy USA
VS
Americana RestaurantsAmericana Restaurants
Foodbuy USA

Foodbuy USA

2400 Yorkmont Road, Charlotte, NC, 28217, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.foodbuy.com
766/1000Fair

Foodbuy, LLC is the foodservice industry’s leading procurement services organization focused on lowering purchasing and product costs for both our parent company, Compass Group, as well as for our clients and members. Foodbuy negotiates and contracts for more than $35...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:571
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Americana Restaurants

Americana Restaurants

Al Nahda Street, Sharjah, AE

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Americana Restaurants is the largest restaurant operator in the MENA region and Kazakhstan in terms of number of restaurants in its countries of operations. Americana Restaurants operates iconic global brands such as KFC, Pizza Hut, Hardee’s, Krispy Kreme and TGI Friday...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,723
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Foodbuy USA

Foodbuy USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Americana Restaurants

Americana Restaurants

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foodbuy USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Americana Restaurants in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Foodbuy USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foodbuy USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Americana Restaurants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Americana Restaurants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Foodbuy USA

Foodbuy USA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Americana Restaurants

Americana Restaurants

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Foodbuy USA company and Americana Restaurants company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Foodbuy USA and Americana Restaurants, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Foodbuy USA and Americana Restaurants, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Foodbuy USA or Americana Restaurants ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Foodbuy USA or Americana Restaurants ?
Between Foodbuy USA and Americana Restaurants, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Foodbuy USA and Americana Restaurants, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-10777
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-10775
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.4
Complexity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-22055
SUMMARY

Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-22054
SUMMARY

Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-10771
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9