Comparison Overview
Foodbuy Group
Foodbuy Group
Compass House, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 9BQ, GB
Last Update: 16/12/2025
Foodbuy is a leading food procurement organisation based in the UK. With over £2 billion of managed spend, we bring together the widest range of foodservice and hospitality clients on the planet to buy food, and everything associated with it. We work closely with our cl...
Transnet SOC Ltd
138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, 2001, ZA
Last Update: 13/09/2026
As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Foodbuy Group
Transnet SOC Ltd
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Foodbuy Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
Transnet SOC Ltd has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Foodbuy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Foodbuy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Foodbuy Group
Transnet SOC Ltd
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.