Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFFNourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF
VS
DanoneDanone
Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF

Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF

N/A

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

We define the industry landscape by nourishing people, products and our planet. Every day, through our IFF PRODUCT DESIGN™ approach, we leverage our proprietary technologies; industry-leading portfolio of modulators, flavorings, texturants, inclusions, cultures, prote...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:131
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danone

Danone

17 boulevard Haussmann, Paris, 75000, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.danone.com
807/1000Good

Danone is a leading global food and beverage company operating in three health-focused, fast-growing, and on-trend Categories: Essential Dairy & Plant-Based products, Waters, and Specialized Nutrition. With a long-standing mission of bringing health through food to as...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:70,667
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF

Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danone

Danone

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danone in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF

Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danone

Danone

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF company and Danone company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF and Danone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF and Danone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF or Danone ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF or Danone ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF and Danone, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nourishing the Future of Food and Beverages at IFF and Danone, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8