Comparison Overview
Food Standards Agency

Food Standards Agency
70 Petty France, London, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 25/03/2026
We are the Food Standards Agency. It’s our job to use our expertise and influence so that people can trust that they consume is safe, what it says it is, healthier and more sustainable. We want people to understand the truth about where our food comes from and what’...

United States Postal Service
475 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, D.C., US, 20260
Last Update: 16/04/2026
As the United States Postal Service continues its evolution as a forward-thinking, fast-acting company capable of providing quality products and services for its customers, it continues to remember and celebrate its roots as the first national network of communications ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Food Standards Agency







United States Postal Service






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Food Standards Agency in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
United States Postal Service has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Food Standards Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Food Standards Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - United States Postal Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)
United States Postal Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Food Standards Agency

United States Postal Service
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.