Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fondation Bouygues ImmobilierFondation Bouygues Immobilier
VS
JLLJLL
Fondation Bouygues Immobilier

Fondation Bouygues Immobilier

N/A

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile

Créée en 2009, la Fondation Bouygues immobilier a pour mission de faire aimer et faire ensemble la ville, en développant des initiatives solidaires pour favoriser le vivre-ensemble en ville et l’accès aux arts et à la nature pour tous. Pour répondre à sa mission la Fo...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:96
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
JLL

JLL

200 East Randolph Drive, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60601

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://co.jll/4ozAe4W
790/1000Fair

We’re a leading professional services firm that specializes in real estate and investment management. JLL shapes the future of real estate for a better world by using the most advanced technology to create rewarding opportunities, amazing spaces and sustainable real est...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:102,392
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fondation Bouygues Immobilier

Fondation Bouygues Immobilier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JLL

JLL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fondation Bouygues Immobilier in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JLL in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fondation Bouygues Immobilier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fondation Bouygues Immobilier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JLL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JLL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fondation Bouygues Immobilier

Fondation Bouygues Immobilier

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
JLL

JLL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier company and JLL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier and JLL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier and JLL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fondation Bouygues Immobilier or JLL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fondation Bouygues Immobilier or JLL ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier and JLL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fondation Bouygues Immobilier and JLL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1