Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fofonga for Pacific Research ExcellenceFofonga for Pacific Research Excellence
VS
University of ConnecticutUniversity of Connecticut
Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence

Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence

Auckland, 1010, NZ

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Building Pacific research leadership and excellence at Waipapa Taumata Rau, the University of Auckland 💙

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Connecticut

University of Connecticut

352 Mansfield Road, Storrs, CT, US, 06269

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://uconn.edu
798/1000Fair

The University of Connecticut (UConn), a Wall Street Journal top 10 public university, is home to more than 32,000 students, 1,500 faculty, 255,000 proud alumni, and a handsome husky named Jonathan. The University has fourteen schools and colleges: Agriculture and Natu...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,623
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence

Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Connecticut

University of Connecticut

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Connecticut in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Connecticut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Connecticut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence

Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Connecticut

University of Connecticut

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence company and University of Connecticut company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence and University of Connecticut, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence and University of Connecticut, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence or University of Connecticut ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence or University of Connecticut ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence and University of Connecticut, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fofonga for Pacific Research Excellence and University of Connecticut, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2