Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FOD Justitie SPF JusticeFOD Justitie SPF Justice
VS
Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’OntarioOntario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario
FOD Justitie SPF Justice

FOD Justitie SPF Justice

Waterloolaan 115, Brussel, 1000, BE

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://justice.belgium.be
775/1000Fair

The Belgian Federal public service of Justice operates on the crossroads of the three main branches of power: the judicial, the legislative and the executive. The administration enables the courts and tribunals to function and helps create and enforce the law. Importan...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:6,842
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario

CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ontario.ca
796/1000Fair

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario The Ontario Government works to serve the public interest and uphold the public trust by providing Ministers with objective advice and expert guidance. The Ontario Public Service carries out the decisions and policies of t...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:35,796
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FOD Justitie SPF Justice

FOD Justitie SPF Justice

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FOD Justitie SPF Justice in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FOD Justitie SPF Justice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FOD Justitie SPF Justice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FOD Justitie SPF Justice

FOD Justitie SPF Justice

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario

Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice company and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FOD Justitie SPF Justice or Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FOD Justitie SPF Justice or Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FOD Justitie SPF Justice and Ontario Government | Gouvernement de l’Ontario, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1