Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners)Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners)
VS
TeamLease Services LimitedTeamLease Services Limited
Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners)

Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners)

5501 Virginia Way, Brentwood, 37027, US

Last Update: 11/12/2025

View Profile

Focus Search Partners is now Highspring, a leading global professional services organization with three integrated offerings—Consulting, Managed Services, and Talent Solutions. Vaco by Highspring specializes in delivering tailored Talent Solutions. Our expertise include...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TeamLease Services Limited

TeamLease Services Limited

315 Work Avenue Campus, Ascent Building, Bangalore, 560095, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://group.teamlease.com/
784/1000Fair

TeamLease Services is one of India’s leading people supply chain companies offering a range of solutions to 3500+ employers for their hiring, productivity and scale challenges. A Fortune India 500 company listed on the NSE & BSE, TeamLease has hired 20 lakhs+ people ove...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:11,726
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners)

Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TeamLease Services Limited

TeamLease Services Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TeamLease Services Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TeamLease Services Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TeamLease Services Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners)

Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TeamLease Services Limited

TeamLease Services Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) company and TeamLease Services Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) and TeamLease Services Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) and TeamLease Services Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) or TeamLease Services Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) or TeamLease Services Limited ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) and TeamLease Services Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Highspring (Formerly Focus Search Partners) and TeamLease Services Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8