Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.
VS
SAICSAIC
FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.

FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.

Oğulbey Mahallesi Kumludere Caddesi No:11, Ankara, 06780, TR

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fnss.com.tr
757/1000Fair

FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş., is a globally recognized company that specializes in designing and producing wheeled and tracked armoured combat vehicles as well as combat engineering vehicles, turrets and sustainability solutions. As the solution provider of choice of us...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:876
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SAIC

SAIC

12010 Sunset Hills Road, Reston, 20190, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile

SAIC® is a premier Fortune 500 mission integrator focused on advancing the power of technology and innovation to serve and protect our world. Our robust portfolio of offerings across the defense, space, civilian and intelligence markets includes secure high-end solution...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:36,661
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.

FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SAIC

SAIC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAIC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SAIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.

FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SAIC

SAIC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. company and SAIC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. and SAIC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. and SAIC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. or SAIC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. or SAIC ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. and SAIC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş. and SAIC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2