Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de CervezaFNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza
VS
Krispy KremeKrispy Kreme
FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza

FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, UY

Last Update: 09/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fnc.com.uy
765/1000Fair

Fábricas Nacionales de Cerveza S.A, tiene origen en 1866 convirtiéndose así en una compañía de bebidas referente en el país. Durante todos estos años hemos reunido a los uruguayos a través de la cerveza, la familia y amigos, el deporte, la música y la cultura local, cre...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:361
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Krispy Kreme

Krispy Kreme

2116 Hawkins St, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28203

Last Update: 27/05/2026

View Profile
350/1000Critical

Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Krispy Kreme is one of the most beloved and well-known sweet treat brands in the world. Our iconic Original Glazed® doughnut is universally recognized for its hot-off-the-line, melt-in-your-mouth experience. Krispy Kreme operates in mor...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,305
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza

FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Krispy Kreme

Krispy Kreme

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Krispy Kreme has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Krispy Kreme (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Krispy Kreme cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza

FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Krispy Kreme

Krispy Kreme

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KRI1779668812
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KRI1768390561
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
KRI5093650100125

FAQ

Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza company and Krispy Kreme company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza and Krispy Kreme, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza and Krispy Kreme, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza or Krispy Kreme ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza or Krispy Kreme ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza and Krispy Kreme, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FNC - Fabricas Nacionales de Cerveza and Krispy Kreme, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8