Comparison Overview
Flynn Panera

Flynn Panera
6200 Oak Tree Blvd S, Independence, 44131, US
Last Update: 27/08/2026
Flynn Group | Panera owns and operates over 130 Panera Bread Café’s in 8 states. With annualized sales of over $350M and over 6,000 employees, Flynn Group | Panera is the third largest Panera Bread franchisee. Flynn Group | Panera is a part of Flynn Group, the larg...

Jimmy John's
3 Glenlake Pkwy NE, Sandy Springs, Georgia, US, 30328
Last Update: 19/09/2026
THE SANDWICH OF SANDWICHES℠ At Jimmy John's, we don't make sandwiches. We make The Sandwich of Sandwiches℠. We use fresh vegetables because we don't hate salads, we just feel bad for them. We hand-slice our provolone cheese and meats in-house every day, because packag...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Flynn Panera







Jimmy John's






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
Flynn Panera has 51.69% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jimmy John's in 2026.
Incident History - Flynn Panera (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Flynn Panera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jimmy John's (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jimmy John's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Flynn Panera

Jimmy John's
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.