Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FlygtFlygt
VS
Alfa LavalAlfa Laval
Flygt

Flygt

301 Water St SE, Washington, 20003, US

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
743/1000Moderate

Flygt, a brand of Xylem, is synonymous with engineering excellence, reliability and closeness to customers. Flygt is a world-leader in the design and manufacture of dry and submersible pumps, mixers and related intelligent controls systems. Under the Flygt banner, cust...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:25
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alfa Laval

Alfa Laval

Rudeboksvagen 1, Lund, Skane County, SE, 226 55

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.alfalaval.com
779/1000Fair

Pioneering positive impact! Our pioneering 140-year-old start-up culture is built on the idea that partnership is the key to solving complex problems and unlocking the full potential of resources. So we collaborate closely with our partners, customers, and thought lead...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:15,317
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Flygt

Flygt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alfa Laval

Alfa Laval

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flygt in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alfa Laval in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Flygt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flygt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alfa Laval (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alfa Laval cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Flygt

Flygt

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alfa Laval

Alfa Laval

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Flygt company and Alfa Laval company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Flygt and Alfa Laval, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Flygt and Alfa Laval, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Flygt or Alfa Laval ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Flygt or Alfa Laval ?
Between Flygt and Alfa Laval, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Flygt and Alfa Laval, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9