Comparison Overview
Flutter Entertainment

Flutter Entertainment
Flutter Entertainment, 300 Park Avenue S, New York, New York, US, NY 10010
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Flutter is the world’s leading online sports betting and gaming company, operating some of the most innovative, diverse and distinctive brands in the sector such as FanDuel, Sky Betting and Sky Gaming, Paddy Power, PokerStars, Betfair, Sportsbet, Tombola, Adjarabet, Sis...

Walt Disney World
Post Office Box 10000, Lake Buena Vista, 32830, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
The Walt Disney World® Resort features four theme parks — the Magic Kingdom® Park, Epcot®, Disney's Hollywood Studios™, and Disney's Animal Kingdom® Theme Park. More than 20 resort hotels are on-site, offering several thousand rooms of themed accommodations. The nearly ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Flutter Entertainment







Walt Disney World






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Flutter Entertainment in 2026.
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Walt Disney World in 2026.
Incident History - Flutter Entertainment (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Flutter Entertainment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Walt Disney World (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Walt Disney World cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Flutter Entertainment

Walt Disney World
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.