Comparison Overview
Flutter Entertainment

Flutter Entertainment
Flutter Entertainment, 300 Park Avenue S, New York, New York, US, NY 10010
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Flutter is the world’s leading online sports betting and gaming company, operating some of the most innovative, diverse and distinctive brands in the sector such as FanDuel, Sky Betting and Sky Gaming, Paddy Power, PokerStars, Betfair, Sportsbet, Tombola, Adjarabet, Sis...

Universal Orlando Resort
1000 Universal Studios Plaza, Orlando, 32819, US
Last Update: 15/09/2026
For years, we’ve been creating a legacy of unforgettable experiences for our Guests. Our Guests are immersed into the sights and sounds of some of the greatest movies and most legendary stories, and our Team Members are the ones who help make those incredible experience...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Flutter Entertainment







Universal Orlando Resort






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Flutter Entertainment in 2026.
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Universal Orlando Resort in 2026.
Incident History - Flutter Entertainment (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Flutter Entertainment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Universal Orlando Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Universal Orlando Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Flutter Entertainment

Universal Orlando Resort
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.