Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fluke CorporationFluke Corporation
VS
Bharat Heavy Electricals LimitedBharat Heavy Electricals Limited
Fluke Corporation

Fluke Corporation

6920 Seaway Blvd., Everett, 98203, US

Last Update: 15/05/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://www.fluke.com/en-us/
576/1000Very Poor

Fluke Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fortive Corporation (NYSE: FTV), is the world leader in the manufacture, distribution and service of electronic test tools and software. Fluke is proud to be one of Fortive’s 10 operating companies. Fortive is a diverse g...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:3,257
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Siri Fort Road, New Delhi, 110049, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bhel.com
783/1000Fair

Established in 1964, BHEL is one of India's largest engineering and manufacturing enterprises in the energy and infrastructure sectors, and a leading power equipment manufacturer globally. BHEL serves the core sectors of the economy and provides a comprehensive portfoli...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:21,195
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fluke Corporation

Fluke Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Fluke Corporation has 48.45% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fluke Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fluke Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fluke Corporation

Fluke Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FLU1778790662
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FLU1778869908
🔒 Incident : Breach
FLU455071325
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fluke Corporation company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fluke Corporation and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fluke Corporation and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fluke Corporation or Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fluke Corporation or Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ?
Between Fluke Corporation and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fluke Corporation and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA