Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fluid Components International (FCI)Fluid Components International (FCI)
VS
ABBABB
Fluid Components International (FCI)

Fluid Components International (FCI)

1755 La Costa Meadows Dr, San Marcos, CA, 92078-5187, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Fluid Components International (FCI) designs and manufactures thermal mass flow meters, flow switches and level switches for industrial process measurement applications utilizing patented thermal dispersion flow measurement technologies. FCI products deliver accuracy an...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:173
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
ABB

ABB

Affolternstrasse 44, Zurich, 8050, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://social.abb/website
809/1000Good

ABB is a technology leader in electrification and automation, enabling a more sustainable and resource-efficient future. The company’s solutions connect engineering know-how and software to optimize how things are manufactured, moved, powered and operated. Building on o...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:134,646
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fluid Components International (FCI)

Fluid Components International (FCI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ABB

ABB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fluid Components International (FCI) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fluid Components International (FCI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fluid Components International (FCI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ABB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fluid Components International (FCI)

Fluid Components International (FCI)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FLU051072425
ABB

ABB

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABB02812623
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABB225090125

FAQ

Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) company and ABB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) and ABB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) and ABB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fluid Components International (FCI) or ABB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fluid Components International (FCI) or ABB ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) and ABB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fluid Components International (FCI) and ABB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8