Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
FlowiseAI

FlowiseAI Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

flowiseai.com

Flowise is an open source drag & drop tool to build your customized LLM flow. We provide a visual interface to let you build backends for LLM apps used for QnA, summarization and analysis on your documents.


FlowiseAI A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

FlowiseAI
Company Information
Website:https://flowiseai.com
Employees number:3
Number of followers:11,223
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:flowiseai.com
FlowiseAI Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
FlowiseAISoftware Development
Updated:
05/05/2026
731/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
FlowiseAI Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
FlowiseAISoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

FlowiseAI
FlowiseAIModerate
Current Score
731Ba (MODERATE)
01000
5 incidents
-5.33 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
733Before Incident
JULY 2026
733Before Incident
JUNE 2026
732Before Incident
MAY 2026
731Before Incident
APRIL 2026
736Before Incident
Vulnerability
20 Apr 2026FlowiseAI
Anthropic, Flowise, DocsGPT and IBM: Critical Vulnerability In Flowise Allows Remote Command Execution Via MCP Adapters

Critical AI Framework Vulnerability Exposes Millions to Remote Code Execution

730After Incident
CRITICAL-6
ANTARCFLOIBM1776659058
Critical AI Framework Vulnerability Exposes Millions to Remote Code Execution Researchers at OX Security have uncovered a severe architectural flaw in the Model Context Protocol (MCP), a communication standard developed by Anthropic and embedded in AI frameworks across Python, TypeScript, Java, and Rust. The vulnerability enables remote code execution (RCE), exposing sensitive data including API keys, internal databases, and chat histories across the AI supply chain. The flaw affects Flowise, a widely used open-source AI workflow builder, and extends to over 200,000 vulnerable instances, with 150 million downloads and 7,000 publicly accessible servers at risk. During testing, OX Security successfully executed live commands on six production platforms, demonstrating the flaw’s real-world impact. Key Exploitation Vectors Identified: - Unauthenticated UI injection in major AI frameworks. - Hardening bypasses in "protected" environments like Flowise. - Zero-click prompt injection in AI IDEs (e.g., Windsurf, Cursor). - Malicious MCP server distribution, with 9 out of 11 registries compromised in testing. At least ten CVEs have been issued, covering critical vulnerabilities in platforms such as LiteLLM, LangChain, GPT Researcher, DocsGPT, and IBM’s LangFlow. Despite OX Security’s recommendations for root-level patches, Anthropic declined to implement protocol-wide fixes, describing the behavior as "expected." The company did not oppose the public disclosure of the findings. The incident underscores systemic risks in AI infrastructure, with the flaw inherited by any developer building on MCP expanding the attack surface across the ecosystem. Security teams are advised to restrict public exposure of AI services, treat MCP inputs as untrusted, and enforce sandboxed environments. Patches for affected platforms are now available.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
IMPACT
API keysInternal databasesChat historiesSystems Affected: AI frameworks (Python, TypeScript, Java, Rust), Flowise, LiteLLM, LangChain, GPT Researcher, DocsGPT, IBM’s LangFlowOperational Impact: Exposure of sensitive data and potential remote code execution across AI supply chainBrand Reputation Impact: Systemic risks in AI infrastructure highlighted
DATA BREACH
API keysInternal databasesChat historiesSensitivity Of Data: High
APRIL 2026
740Before Incident
Vulnerability
07 Apr 2026FlowiseAI
Flowise: Attackers Exploit Flowise Injection Vulnerability as 15,000+ Instances Remain Exposed

Critical Flowise AI Platform Vulnerability Exploited in the Wild (CVE-2025-59528)

735After Incident
CRITICAL-5
FLO1775557725
Critical Flowise AI Platform Vulnerability Exploited in the Wild (CVE-2025-59528) A severe code injection vulnerability in Flowise, a widely used open-source AI development platform, is actively being exploited by attackers. Tracked as CVE-2025-59528 with a CVSS score of 10.0, the flaw allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and gain full control of affected servers. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of external server configurations in Flowise’s CustomMCP (Model Context Protocol) node. When processing user-provided input, the platform evaluates the data as unfiltered JavaScript code via Node.js’s `Function()` constructor, enabling attackers to inject malicious commands. Exploitation requires only a single crafted request to a vulnerable API endpoint, granting attackers access to system modules, file operations, and command execution. Security firm VulnCheck detected the first live attacks, originating from a Starlink IP address. Successful exploitation can lead to full system compromise, unauthorized file access, data exfiltration, and silent execution of system-level commands. Approximately 15,000 Flowise instances remain exposed on the public internet, heightening the risk for organizations using the platform. This is not the first time Flowise has been targeted previous vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-8943 and CVE-2025-26319) were also exploited in recent months. The flaw affects Flowise versions 3.0.5 and earlier, with a patch released in version 3.0.6. Security teams are urged to upgrade immediately to mitigate the threat.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Code Injection
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Unauthorized file access, data exfiltrationSystems Affected: Flowise servers (versions 3.0.5 and earlier)Operational Impact: Full system compromise, silent execution of system-level commands
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: System files, potentially sensitive dataSensitivity Of Data: High (system-level access)Data Exfiltration: Possible
MARCH 2026
740Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
740Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
739Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
739Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
739Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
738Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
742Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Sep 2025FlowiseAI
Flowise: Critical Flowise RCE Vulnerability Actively Exploited, Thousands of Systems at Risk

Critical Flowise RCE Vulnerability (CVE-2025-59528) Actively Exploited in the Wild

737After Incident
CRITICAL-5
FLO1775643912
Critical Flowise RCE Vulnerability (CVE-2025-59528) Actively Exploited in the Wild A maximum-severity remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Flowise, tracked as CVE-2025-59528, is now under active exploitation. The flaw allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems, potentially leading to full compromise. The vulnerability stems from unsafe handling of user input in the CustomMCP node, a component used to connect with external Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript via the `mcpServerConfig` setting, bypassing validation checks. The issue was first disclosed in September 2024, with warnings that exploitation could enable command execution and unauthorized file system access. Flowise, an open-source low-code platform for building AI agents and LLM workflows, released a patch in version 3.0.6, with the latest secure version (3.1.1) released two weeks ago. Despite the fix, real-world exploitation has been observed. Exploitation Evidence & Attack Surface Security researchers at VulnCheck detected initial exploitation attempts originating from a Starlink IP address. Their analysis identified 12,000–15,000 publicly exposed Flowise instances, though the exact number of vulnerable deployments remains unclear. While current activity appears limited, the broad attack surface increases the risk of wider exploitation as exploit techniques proliferate. Additional Vulnerabilities Under Attack CVE-2025-59528 is not the only Flowise flaw being targeted. Two other vulnerabilities CVE-2025-8943 and CVE-2025-26319 have also been added to VulnCheck’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating a pattern of attackers leveraging multiple flaws to gain unauthorized access. Organizations using Flowise are urged to upgrade to the latest patched version to mitigate risks. The incident underscores the growing threat to AI-driven development platforms as attackers increasingly target low-code environments.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Flowise instances (12,000–15,000 publicly exposed)Operational Impact: Potential full system compromise, unauthorized file system access, command execution
JUNE 2025
746Before Incident
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2025FlowiseAI
FlowiseAI

Critical Password Reset Vulnerability in FlowiseAI (CVE-2025-58434)

741After Incident
CRITICAL-5
FLO3432334091525
A critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-58434, CVSS 9.8) in FlowiseAI’s password reset mechanism exposes all versions before 3.0.5 to account takeover attacks. The flaw in the `/api/v1/account/forgot-password` endpoint discloses sensitive user data—including user IDs, emails, hashed credentials, and valid password reset tokens—directly in the API response, bypassing email verification. Attackers need only a victim’s email (often publicly obtainable) to execute two simple HTTP requests: one to fetch the token and another to reset the password. No authentication or user interaction is required, enabling silent, full account compromise.High-privilege and administrator accounts are equally vulnerable, risking unauthorized AI workflow manipulation, data exfiltration, or malicious automation injection. The absence of a patch (as of discovery) amplifies risks, with potential consequences ranging from operational disruption to full organizational takeover. Mitigation relies on temporary access restrictions, MFA enforcement, and real-time monitoring of reset activities. The flaw underscores systemic API security gaps, demanding urgent remediation to prevent large-scale exploitation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
User IDsNamesEmail addressesHashed credentialsPassword reset tokens (tempToken)FlowiseAI (cloud-hosted deployments)FlowiseAI (self-hosted deployments)AI workflow automation platformsPotential manipulation of AI workflowsUnauthorized automation tasksOperational disruptionBrand Reputation Impact: High (due to account takeover risks and potential data breaches)Identity Theft Risk: High (if PII or credentials are exposed)
DATA BREACH
User account information (ID, name, email)Hashed credentialsPassword reset tokensSensitivity Of Data: High (credentials and tokens enable account takeover)Data Exfiltration: Potential (if attackers gain access to admin accounts)Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (if user accounts contain PII)
MAY 2025
749Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 May 2025FlowiseAI
Deepseek, Anthropic, OpenAI, n8n and Flowise: We Scanned 1 Million Exposed AI Services. Here's How Bad the Security Actually Is

AI Infrastructure Security Crisis: Exposed Systems, Hardcoded Flaws, and Rampant Misconfigurations

746After Incident
CRITICAL-3
FLODEEANTOPEN8N1777984637
AI Infrastructure Security Crisis: Exposed Systems, Hardcoded Flaws, and Rampant Misconfigurations A recent investigation by the Intruder team reveals a alarming trend in AI infrastructure security, as rapid adoption outpaces safeguards. Scanning over 2 million hosts with 1 million exposed services, researchers found AI deployments riddled with vulnerabilities more severe than any other software category they’ve analyzed. No Authentication by Default A core issue: many self-hosted AI projects ship without authentication enabled, leaving sensitive data and tools exposed. Real-world examples included chatbots with unrestricted access to user conversation histories, multimodal LLMs vulnerable to jailbreaking, and even NSFW chatbots leaking API keys in plaintext. One OpenUI-based instance exposed full LLM conversation logs, while others allowed malicious users to bypass safety guardrails using corporate infrastructure to generate illegal content or solicit criminal advice. Exposed Agent Platforms and Business Logic Agent management platforms like n8n and Flowise were frequently found misconfigured, with some instances mistakenly exposed to the internet. One Flowise deployment revealed an entire LLM chatbot’s business logic, including credential lists (though stored values remained protected). Another exposed parsing tools and local functions capable of server-side code execution. Across sectors government, finance, and marketing over 90 exposed instances were identified, enabling attackers to modify workflows, redirect traffic, or poison responses. Unsecured Ollama APIs: A Gateway to Frontier Models Researchers discovered 5,200+ exposed Ollama APIs with connected models, 31% of which responded to unauthenticated queries. While Ollama doesn’t store conversation data, many instances wrapped paid models from Anthropic, Google, Deepseek, Moonshot, and OpenAI 518 in total. Responses ranged from health-focused assistants to cloud management integrations, highlighting the risks of unauthorized access to enterprise systems. Insecure by Design Lab analysis uncovered systemic flaws: - Poor deployment practices: Misconfigured Docker setups, hardcoded credentials, and applications running as root. - No authentication on fresh installs: Users granted high-privilege access by default. - Static credentials: Embedded in setup examples and `docker-compose` files. - New vulnerabilities: Arbitrary code execution found in a popular AI project within days. Root Cause: Speed Over Security The findings underscore a broader industry shift vendors and adopters prioritizing rapid deployment over decades of security best practices. While some projects abandon safeguards entirely, the pressure to outpace competitors exacerbates the problem. The result: AI infrastructure with a 2.6 CVE-per-day average (as seen in the ClawdBot incident), where misconfigurations and weak sandboxing amplify risks. The investigation serves as a stark reminder of the security debt accumulating in the AI gold rush.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MisconfigurationAuthentication BypassData ExposureCode Execution
MOTIVATION
Opportunistic ExploitationData TheftUnauthorized Access
IMPACT
LLM conversation logsAPI keysBusiness logicCredential listsUser conversation historiesPersonally identifiable informationSelf-hosted AI projectsAgent management platforms (n8n, Flowise)Ollama APIsMultimodal LLMsChatbotsNSFW chatbotsUnauthorized modification of workflowsTraffic redirectionResponse poisoningServer-side code executionBrand Reputation Impact: HighIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
LLM conversation logsAPI keysBusiness logicCredential listsUser conversation historiesSensitivity Of Data: HighPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for FlowiseAI ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on FlowiseAI's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with FlowiseAI ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view FlowiseAI's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
FlowiseAI Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo