Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Flock SafetyFlock Safety
VS
TÜV SÜDTÜV SÜD
Flock Safety

Flock Safety

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Last Update: 22/06/2026

View Profile
407/1000Critical

Flock Safety is the leading public safety platform designed to help communities prevent and reduce crime, not just respond to it. We partner with cities, law enforcement agencies, schools, businesses, and neighborhoods to deliver real-time, objective intelligence that h...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:1,454
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

Westendstr. 199, Munich, Germany, DE, 80686

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tuvsud.com
796/1000Fair

TÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:17,734
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Flock Safety

Flock Safety

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

Flock Safety has 100.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV SÜD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Flock Safety (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flock Safety cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TÜV SÜD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV SÜD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Flock Safety

Flock Safety

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FLO1782132974
🔒 Incident : Breach
FLOVEN1772764366
🔒 Incident : Breach
CITFLO1772001588
TÜV SÜD

TÜV SÜD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Flock Safety company and TÜV SÜD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Flock Safety and TÜV SÜD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Flock Safety and TÜV SÜD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Flock Safety or TÜV SÜD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Flock Safety or TÜV SÜD ?
Between Flock Safety and TÜV SÜD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Flock Safety and TÜV SÜD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA