Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FlightfoxFlightfox
VS
American Express Global Business TravelAmerican Express Global Business Travel
Flightfox

Flightfox

Pearl Street, Boulder, 80301, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://flightfox.com
756/1000Fair

Flightfox is a complete enterprise travel platform. We apply technology to genuine expertise to manage all of your travel, optimize your credit card strategy, maximize your loyalty benefits and make your travels better than ever. With the unique combination of technolog...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
American Express Global Business Travel

American Express Global Business Travel

666 3rd Ave, New York, 10017, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://go.amexgbt.com/home
733/1000Moderate

Business travel doesn’t just move people from A to B, it helps ideas and innovation move forward, too. And with the most valuable marketplace, software, and services in travel, there is nowhere they can’t go with American Express Global Business Travel. With us, your Gr...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:31,764
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Flightfox

Flightfox

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
American Express Global Business Travel

American Express Global Business Travel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flightfox in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Express Global Business Travel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Flightfox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flightfox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - American Express Global Business Travel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Express Global Business Travel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Flightfox

Flightfox

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
American Express Global Business Travel

American Express Global Business Travel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AME331072925
🔒 Incident : Breach
AME027091825
🔒 Incident : Breach
AME1000091725

FAQ

Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Flightfox company and American Express Global Business Travel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Flightfox and American Express Global Business Travel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Flightfox and American Express Global Business Travel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Flightfox or American Express Global Business Travel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Flightfox or American Express Global Business Travel ?
Between Flightfox and American Express Global Business Travel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Flightfox and American Express Global Business Travel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2