Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLCFlexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC
VS
Thermax LimitedThermax Limited
Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC

Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC

291 Hurricane Lane, Williston, 05495, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.flexaseal.com
718/1000Moderate

Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, a trusted partner for premium mechanical seals and innovative sealing solutions, caters to diverse industrial sectors with expertise in designing and manufacturing high-performance seals for rotating equipment like pumps, mixers, ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:139
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Thermax Limited

Thermax Limited

IN, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

Incorporated in 1966, Thermax Group is a 1 billion US$ company headquartered in Pune, India. Over the years, it has grown into a leading conglomerate in the energy and environment space and a trusted partner in energy transition. Strategically spreading its operations ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:11,086
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC

Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Thermax Limited

Thermax Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thermax Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Thermax Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thermax Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC

Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FLE623072625
Thermax Limited

Thermax Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC company and Thermax Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC and Thermax Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC and Thermax Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC or Thermax Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC or Thermax Limited ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC and Thermax Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Flexaseal Engineered Seals and Systems, LLC and Thermax Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9