Comparison Overview
Flagstar Third Party Origination

Flagstar Third Party Origination
100 Huffy Avenue , Hicksville, New York, US, 11801
Last Update: 02/12/2025
Thank you for visiting Flagstar Bank Third Party Origination on LinkedIn, and we look forward to being part of your financial journey. On December 1, 2022, New York Community Bank (NYCB) and Flagstar Bank joined together to become one company. New York Community Banco...

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Building, Abu Dhabi, 939, AE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Established in 1985, ADCB places its focus on the UAE where it helps to make a significant contribution to the economy and community it serves. Our aspiration to be the number one bank of choice in the UAE is fueled by the strength and effectiveness of our strategy. Gui...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Flagstar Third Party Origination







Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Flagstar Third Party Origination in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank in 2026.
Incident History - Flagstar Third Party Origination (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Flagstar Third Party Origination cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Flagstar Third Party Origination

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.