Comparison Overview
Flagstar Bank

Flagstar Bank
Hicksville, NY , US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Thank you for visiting Flagstar Bank, N.A. on LinkedIn, and we look forward to being part of your financial journey. Today, Flagstar Bank, N.A., is one of the largest regional banks in the country. The company is headquartered in Hicksville, New York. At December 31, 20...

Punjab National Bank
Punjab National Bank, New Delhi, 110075, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
“Fired by the spirit of nationalism and founded on the idea that Indians should have a national bank of their own, which would further the economic interest of the country, Punjab National Bank Ltd was the result of the efforts of far-sighted visionaries and patriots, a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Flagstar Bank







Punjab National Bank






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Flagstar Bank in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Punjab National Bank in 2026.
Incident History - Flagstar Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Flagstar Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Punjab National Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Punjab National Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Flagstar Bank

Punjab National Bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.