Comparison Overview
Flagship Facility Services, Inc.

Flagship Facility Services, Inc.
1050 North 5th Street, San Jose, 95112, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Flagship Facility Services is a facilities maintenance company headquartered in Southlake, Texas. In 35 years, Flagship has grown from a one-person startup to a leader in the rapidly developing FM space. We now provide holistic solutions to more than 1,800 client locati...

Mitie
The Shard, Level 12, 32 London Bridge Street, London, SE1 9SG, GB
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Founded in 1987, Mitie is the UK’s leading facilities management and professional services company. We offer a range of specialist services including Security, Engineering Services, Cleaning, Landscaping, Energy and Property Consultancy, Property Maintenance, and Custod...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Flagship Facility Services, Inc.







Mitie






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Flagship Facility Services, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mitie in 2026.
Incident History - Flagship Facility Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Flagship Facility Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mitie (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mitie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Flagship Facility Services, Inc.

Mitie
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.