Comparison Overview
Fit For Work

Fit For Work
4040 Broadway Street Suite 220, San Antonio, TX, 78209, US
Last Update: 29/11/2025
Fit For Work™ is an Injury Prevention firm that partners with large companies to deliver a 50% reduction in injuries so they can focus on their business. For over 20 years, our diverse team Athletic Trainers, Occupational Therapist, Physical Therapist, Certified Profess...

Massage Envy
14350 N. 87th St., Suite 200, Scottsdale, 85260, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Massage Envy is a leading wellness franchise providing professional massage, skin care, and assisted stretch services nationwide. Co-founded by a massage therapist in 2002, the brand’s mission is simple: make total body care accessible and affordable so people can feel ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fit For Work







Massage Envy






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fit For Work in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Massage Envy in 2026.
Incident History - Fit For Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fit For Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Massage Envy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Massage Envy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fit For Work

Massage Envy
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.