Comparison Overview
Foxconn Interconnect Technology (FIT)

Foxconn Interconnect Technology (FIT)
US
Last Update: 14/12/2025
FIT is an innovative market leader of connectivity technologies within the data center, mobile, computing, and IoT environments. Foxconn Interconnect Technology, Ltd. (FIT) has offices and manufacturing sites located in Asia, the Americas, and Europe. FIT develops, manu...

Foxconn
US
Last Update: 18/06/2026
Established in Taiwan in 1974, Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) (2317: Taiwan) is the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. Foxconn is also the leading technological solution provider, and it continuously leverages its expertise in software and hardware to integra...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Foxconn Interconnect Technology (FIT)







Foxconn






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Foxconn Interconnect Technology (FIT) in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Foxconn has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Foxconn Interconnect Technology (FIT) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Foxconn Interconnect Technology (FIT) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Foxconn (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Foxconn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Foxconn Interconnect Technology (FIT)

Foxconn
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.