Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fiskars GroupFiskars Group
VS
Whirlpool CorporationWhirlpool Corporation
Fiskars Group

Fiskars Group

Keilaniementie 10, None, Espoo, Uusimaa, FI, 02150

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fiskarsgroup.com
722/1000Moderate

Fiskars Group (FSKRS, Nasdaq Helsinki) is the global home of design-driven brands for indoor and outdoor living. We are driven by our common purpose: Pioneering design to make the everyday extraordinary. Since 1649, we have designed products of timeless, purposeful, and...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:2,987
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Whirlpool Corporation

Whirlpool Corporation

2000 North M63, Benton Harbor, Michigan, US, 49022

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.whirlpoolcorp.com
789/1000Fair

Life at home has been at the heart of our business for 110+ years - it is why we exist and why we are passionate about what we do. Beginning with our founders to the everyday actions of our people, our values have always kept us grounded -- Integrity, Respect, Inclusion...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:45,454
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fiskars Group

Fiskars Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Whirlpool Corporation

Whirlpool Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fiskars Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whirlpool Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fiskars Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fiskars Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Whirlpool Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whirlpool Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fiskars Group

Fiskars Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FIS621072525
Whirlpool Corporation

Whirlpool Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
WHI204219222

FAQ

Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fiskars Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fiskars Group and Whirlpool Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fiskars Group and Whirlpool Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fiskars Group or Whirlpool Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fiskars Group or Whirlpool Corporation ?
Between Fiskars Group and Whirlpool Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fiskars Group and Whirlpool Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA