Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fisher HealthcareFisher Healthcare
VS
Region HovedstadenRegion Hovedstaden
Fisher Healthcare

Fisher Healthcare

168 Third Avenue, Waltham, 02451, US

Last Update: 14/07/2026

View Profile
706/1000Moderate

Impacting the health of your patients and organizations. A Thermo Fisher Scientific brand.

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Region Hovedstaden

Region Hovedstaden

Kongens Vaenge 2, Hillerod, 3400, DK

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.regionh.dk/job
783/1000Fair

Det handler om liv. Om at bringe liv til verden og skabe livskvalitet. Om at redde liv og forbedre liv. Som medarbejder i Region Hovedstaden træder du ind i en verden af muligheder og mangfoldighed med plads til dine ambitioner. Du er en del af et stærkt fagligt miljø, ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:23,626
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fisher Healthcare

Fisher Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Region Hovedstaden

Region Hovedstaden

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fisher Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Region Hovedstaden in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fisher Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fisher Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Region Hovedstaden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Region Hovedstaden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fisher Healthcare

Fisher Healthcare

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FISMIC1784032242
Region Hovedstaden

Region Hovedstaden

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fisher Healthcare company and Region Hovedstaden company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fisher Healthcare and Region Hovedstaden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fisher Healthcare and Region Hovedstaden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fisher Healthcare or Region Hovedstaden ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fisher Healthcare or Region Hovedstaden ?
Between Fisher Healthcare and Region Hovedstaden, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fisher Healthcare and Region Hovedstaden, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1