Comparison Overview

First Quantum Minerals

VS

Alcoa

First Quantum Minerals

8th Floor – 543 Granville Street, Canada V6C 1X8, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-20

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. is a global mining company producing copper and nickel, as well as gold and cobalt. Our growing portfolio of operations and projects spans four continents and employs around 20,000 people. We are well-known for our ‘can do’ attitude and specialist technical, project management, engineering, construction and operational skills, which allow us to develop and successfully run complex mines and minerals processing plants. We strive to go beyond the goals set by other companies. After 25 years of operations we are now one of the world’s top 10 copper producers and we focus on providing a tangible benefit from everything we do for employees, investors and the many communities that host our operations. From our initial operation reprocessing tailings facilities in Zambia, to the recently completed giant Cobre Panama operation, we have recorded many significant commercial and technical achievements over the past two decades. By 2021, the combined output of our mines will be more than 800,000 tonnes of copper per year.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 12,295
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alcoa

201 Isabella St., Suite 500, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15212
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Recruitment Fraud Alert: Alcoa has become aware of some fraudulent employment offers being sent to candidates via social media channels. Alcoa never makes job offers or asks for bank details through social media. Always verify the authenticity of any recruitment communication directly through our official channels. Alcoa (NYSE: AA, ASX: AAI) is a global industry leader in bauxite, alumina, and aluminum products with a vision to build a legacy of excellence for future generations. With a values-based approach that encompasses integrity, operating excellence, care for people and courageous leadership, our purpose is to Turn Raw Potential into Real Progress. Since developing the process that made aluminum an affordable and vital part of modern life, our talented Alcoans have developed breakthrough innovations and best practices that have led to greater efficiency, safety, sustainability, and stronger communities wherever we operate.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 17,448
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firstquantumminerals.jpeg
First Quantum Minerals
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alcoa.jpeg
Alcoa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
First Quantum Minerals
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alcoa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Quantum Minerals in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alcoa in 2026.

Incident History — First Quantum Minerals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Quantum Minerals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alcoa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alcoa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firstquantumminerals.jpeg
First Quantum Minerals
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alcoa.jpeg
Alcoa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

First Quantum Minerals company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alcoa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alcoa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to First Quantum Minerals company.

In the current year, Alcoa company and First Quantum Minerals company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alcoa company nor First Quantum Minerals company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alcoa company nor First Quantum Minerals company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alcoa company nor First Quantum Minerals company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither First Quantum Minerals company nor Alcoa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither First Quantum Minerals nor Alcoa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither First Quantum Minerals company nor Alcoa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alcoa company employs more people globally than First Quantum Minerals company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither First Quantum Minerals nor Alcoa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither First Quantum Minerals nor Alcoa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither First Quantum Minerals nor Alcoa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither First Quantum Minerals nor Alcoa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither First Quantum Minerals nor Alcoa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither First Quantum Minerals nor Alcoa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H