Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FirstFruits Marketing, LLC.FirstFruits Marketing, LLC.
VS
BungeBunge
FirstFruits Marketing, LLC.

FirstFruits Marketing, LLC.

402 E Yakima Ave, Yakima, 98901, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.firstfruits.com
698/1000Weak

As a recognized leader in the apple industry for over 40 years, FirstFruits Farms is a premier grower, packer and shipper with 8,000 acres of apples and cherries. Our business philosophy seeks to connect the organization and its employees to a larger purpose of communi...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:27
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Bunge

Bunge

1391 Timberlake Manor Pkwy, Chesterfield, Missouri, US, 63017

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bunge.com
793/1000Fair

At Bunge (NYSE: BG), our purpose is to connect farmers to consumers to deliver essential food, feed and fuel to the world. As a premier agribusiness solutions provider, our team of ~37,000 dedicated employees partner with farmers across the globe to move agricultural co...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:24,659
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FirstFruits Marketing, LLC.

FirstFruits Marketing, LLC.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bunge

Bunge

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bunge in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bunge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bunge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FirstFruits Marketing, LLC.

FirstFruits Marketing, LLC.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FIR1769016719
Bunge

Bunge

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. company and Bunge company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. and Bunge, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. and Bunge, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. or Bunge ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. or Bunge ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. and Bunge, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FirstFruits Marketing, LLC. and Bunge, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8