Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

First Security Islami Bank PLCFirst Security Islami Bank PLC
VS
VakıfBankVakıfBank
First Security Islami Bank PLC

First Security Islami Bank PLC

RD Center, Gulshan -1,, Dhaka, 1212, 1212, BD

Last Update: 23/02/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.fsiblbd.com
842/1000Good

First Security Islami Bank PLC (FSIB) was incorporated in Bangladesh on 29 August 1999 as a Banking company under Companies Act 1994 to carry on banking business. It obtained permission from Bangladesh Bank on 22 September 1999 to commence its business. The Bank went fo...

NAICS:522
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,184
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
VakıfBank

VakıfBank

İstanbul, 34415, TR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vakifbank.com.tr
770/1000Fair

1954 yılında, vakıf kaynaklarını ekonomik kalkınmanın gereksinimleri doğrultusunda en iyi biçimde değerlendirmek amacıyla kurulan VakıfBank, o günden bu yana çağdaş bankacılık yöntemleri ve uygulamalarıyla Türkiye’nin tasarruf düzeyinin gelişim sürecine katkıda bulunmak...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:11,668
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
First Security Islami Bank PLC

First Security Islami Bank PLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VakıfBank

VakıfBank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Security Islami Bank PLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VakıfBank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - First Security Islami Bank PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Security Islami Bank PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VakıfBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VakıfBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
First Security Islami Bank PLC

First Security Islami Bank PLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
VakıfBank

VakıfBank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC company and VakıfBank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC and VakıfBank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC and VakıfBank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - First Security Islami Bank PLC or VakıfBank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - First Security Islami Bank PLC or VakıfBank ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC and VakıfBank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between First Security Islami Bank PLC and VakıfBank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2