Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

First MercantileFirst Mercantile
VS
Morgan StanleyMorgan Stanley
First Mercantile

First Mercantile

57 Germantown Court, Cordova, Tennessee, 38018, US

Last Update: 14/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.firstmerc.com
754/1000Fair

First Mercantile, one of the premier collective investment trust (CIT) recordkeepers in the United States, offers investment solutions for qualified retirement plans. Employing a due diligence process, First Mercantile Trust (FMT) searches the investment universe to sel...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:32
Subsidiaries:61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley

1585 Broadway, New York, 10036, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.morganstanley.com
815/1000Good

Morgan Stanley is a leading global financial services firm providing investment banking, securities, wealth management and investment management services. With a 90-year history, Morgan Stanley today operates in 42 countries serving corporations, governments, institutio...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:103,276
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
First Mercantile

First Mercantile

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Mercantile in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morgan Stanley in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - First Mercantile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Mercantile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Morgan Stanley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morgan Stanley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
First Mercantile

First Mercantile

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOR75918422
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOR115072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOR037072925

FAQ

Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between First Mercantile company and Morgan Stanley company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between First Mercantile and Morgan Stanley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between First Mercantile and Morgan Stanley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - First Mercantile or Morgan Stanley ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - First Mercantile or Morgan Stanley ?
Between First Mercantile and Morgan Stanley, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between First Mercantile and Morgan Stanley, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA