Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

First American TitleFirst American Title
VS
EmaarEmaar
First American Title

First American Title

1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California, 92707, US

Last Update: 22/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.firstam.com/
755/1000Fair

First American Title Insurance Company provides comprehensive title insurance protection and professional settlement services for homebuyers and sellers, real estate agents and brokers, mortgage lenders, commercial property professionals, homebuilders and developers, ti...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Emaar

Emaar

Emaar Square Downtown Dubai, Dubai, 9440, AE

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.emaar.com/
803/1000Good

WHO WE ARE Emaar is a pioneer of master-planned communities in Dubai since its inception in 1997. It is listed on the Dubai Financial Market as a public joint-stock company. Building upon the legacy of our flagship Downtown Dubai creations — the iconic Burj Khalifa, Du...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:15,912
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
First American Title

First American Title

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Emaar

Emaar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First American Title in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emaar in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - First American Title (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First American Title cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Emaar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emaar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
First American Title

First American Title

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Emaar

Emaar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between First American Title company and Emaar company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between First American Title and Emaar, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between First American Title and Emaar, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - First American Title or Emaar ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - First American Title or Emaar ?
Between First American Title and Emaar, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between First American Title and Emaar, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA