Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

First American Data & AnalyticsFirst American Data & Analytics
VS
GLGGLG
First American Data & Analytics

First American Data & Analytics

4 First American Way, Santa Ana, 92707, US

Last Update: 01/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://dna.firstam.com/
757/1000Fair

First American Data & Analytics, a division of First American Financial Corporation, is a national provider of property-centric information, risk management and valuation solutions. First American maintains and curates the industry’s largest property and ownership datas...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GLG

GLG

60 East 42nd Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY, US, 10165

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://glginsights.com
738/1000Moderate

GLG is the world’s largest insight network. We connect decision makers to the right experts so they can act with the confidence that comes from true clarity and have what it takes to get ahead. Our network of experts is the world’s largest source of first-hand expertise...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:12,148
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
First American Data & Analytics

First American Data & Analytics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GLG

GLG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First American Data & Analytics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GLG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - First American Data & Analytics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First American Data & Analytics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GLG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GLG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
First American Data & Analytics

First American Data & Analytics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GLG

GLG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GLG128072625

FAQ

Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between First American Data & Analytics company and GLG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between First American Data & Analytics and GLG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between First American Data & Analytics and GLG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - First American Data & Analytics or GLG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - First American Data & Analytics or GLG ?
Between First American Data & Analytics and GLG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between First American Data & Analytics and GLG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA