Comparison Overview
First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)
Abu Dhabi, 6316, AE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
FAB, the UAE’s largest bank and one of the world’s largest financial institutions offers a an extensive range of tailor-made solutions, and products and services, to provide a customised banking experience. Through its strategic offerings, it looks to meet the banking n...

BNP Paribas Fortis
Rue Montagne du Parc 3, Brussels, 1000, BE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
For over 200 years, BNP Paribas Fortis has helped drive the growth and prosperity of Belgium’s economy and communities. The mission of our 12,000 colleagues is clear: be the trusted financial partner for four million individual customers, businesses and organisations. W...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)







BNP Paribas Fortis






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas Fortis in 2026.
Incident History - First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BNP Paribas Fortis (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BNP Paribas Fortis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)

BNP Paribas Fortis
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.