Comparison Overview
First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)
Abu Dhabi, 6316, AE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
FAB, the UAE’s largest bank and one of the world’s largest financial institutions offers a an extensive range of tailor-made solutions, and products and services, to provide a customised banking experience. Through its strategic offerings, it looks to meet the banking n...

National Bank of Canada
800 Rue Saint-Jacques, Montreal, Quebec, CA, H3C 1A3
Last Update: 05/04/2026
At National Bank, we believe in the potential of each individual, and that even the smallest gestures can make a big difference. When we help others accomplish their projects, we help empower them and the community at large. We try to make a difference through innova...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)







National Bank of Canada






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for National Bank of Canada in 2026.
Incident History - First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - National Bank of Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)
National Bank of Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)

National Bank of Canada
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.