Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FINN.no – mulighetenes markedFINN.no – mulighetenes marked
VS
IndiaMART InterMESH LimitedIndiaMART InterMESH Limited
FINN.no – mulighetenes marked

FINN.no – mulighetenes marked

Grensen 5-7, Postboks 747 Sentrum, Oslo, Norway, NO, 0106

Last Update: 05/07/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Nesten alle i Norge prøvd FINN.no 💙 Hvert år tilbringer hver nordmann i snitt 30 timer på tjenesten vår, og til sammen surfer brukerne våre gjennom mer enn 15 milliarder sider. Snakk om engasjert gjeng! 😻 En jobb i FINN sikrer deg mange gode historier på fest. Det er ...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:430
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd., 6th floor, Tower 2, Assotech Business Cresterra, Noida, 201305, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.indiamart.com/
771/1000Fair

IndiaMART is India's largest online B2B marketplace, connecting buyers with suppliers across a wide array of industries. IndiaMART provides a platform for Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), large enterprises, and individual buyers, helping them access diverse portfolios...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:18,682
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FINN.no – mulighetenes marked

FINN.no – mulighetenes marked

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FINN.no – mulighetenes marked in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IndiaMART InterMESH Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FINN.no – mulighetenes marked (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FINN.no – mulighetenes marked cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IndiaMART InterMESH Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FINN.no – mulighetenes marked

FINN.no – mulighetenes marked

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FINN.no – mulighetenes marked or IndiaMART InterMESH Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FINN.no – mulighetenes marked or IndiaMART InterMESH Limited ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FINN.no – mulighetenes marked and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA