Comparison Overview
Fingent

Fingent
White Plains, New York, 10605, US
Last Update: 11/01/2026
Fingent, an award-winning and ISO 27001:2013-certified custom software development company, is a trusted partner for businesses seeking strategic IT solutions. With more than two decades of experience, we've delivered 700+ projects for clients across four continents. Ou...

Unisys
801 Lakeview Drive, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, US, 19422
Last Update: 28/03/2026
Unisys is a global technology solutions company that powers breakthroughs for the world’s leading organizations. Our solutions – cloud, AI, digital workplace, logistics and enterprise computing – help our clients challenge the status quo and unlock their full potential....
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fingent







Unisys






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fingent in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Unisys in 2026.
Incident History - Fingent (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fingent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Unisys (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Unisys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fingent

Unisys
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.