Fine Impressions
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
fine-impressions
Website:
Employees number:
31
Number of followers:
0
NAICS:
323
Industry Type:
Homepage:
fineimpressions.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
FIN_1513905
Scan Status:
In-progress
Fine Impressions Company CyberSecurity Posture
fineimpressions.com
You know that satisfied feeling you get when you’ve helped someone? We like that feeling… a lot. So that’s what we’re all about at Fine Impressions. Helping you. Our business is printing and finishing greeting cards and invitations, making envelopes and napkins. But in the end, our business is really helping our customers feel success. We have lots of folks who have spent their careers in this business. That’s the kind of experience that is invaluable if you’re looking for help. The people at Fine Impressions like to make a difference. So when we help you with your project, when we help you solve a problem, when we connect you with the right resource, then it’s been a good day for you. And for us. Helping you. That’s how we find success.
Fine Impressions A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Fine Impressions Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 849
Fine Impressions
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Fine Impressions Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Fine Impressions
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Fine Impressions Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
ComplyRight, Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving ComplyRight, Inc. on July 19, 2018. The breach occurred between April 20, 2018 and May 22, 2018, potentially exposing personal information such as names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, and Social Security numbers. The number of individuals affected and whether data was downloaded by unauthorized users remains unknown.
Fine Impressions Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Fine Impressions
Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fine Impressions in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fine Impressions in 2025.
Incident Types Fine Impressions vs Printing Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fine Impressions in 2025.
Incident History — Fine Impressions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fine Impressions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Fine Impressions Company Subsidiaries
You know that satisfied feeling you get when you’ve helped someone? We like that feeling… a lot. So that’s what we’re all about at Fine Impressions. Helping you. Our business is printing and finishing greeting cards and invitations, making envelopes and napkins. But in the end, our business is really helping our customers feel success. We have lots of folks who have spent their careers in this business. That’s the kind of experience that is invaluable if you’re looking for help. The people at Fine Impressions like to make a difference. So when we help you with your project, when we help you solve a problem, when we connect you with the right resource, then it’s been a good day for you. And for us. Helping you. That’s how we find success.
Loading...
Fine Impressions Similar Companies
TKM Print Solutions
TKM is a commercial wide-format digital print shop with an exclusive focus on producing instore retail graphics. If you've shopped in a Walmart, Best Buy, or other major retailer recently, you've probably seen our printed products. We're located in Uniontown, Ohio. Our company was founded in 2008.
Graphics Continuum, Inc.
Graphics Continuum, Inc. is a full-service pre-press, printing, and fulfillment company with graphic design services to create a variety of custom communication materials. From design concept through pre-press to final printing, the company provides total execution of advertising message materials.
FDM Document Solutions
FDM is one of the UK’s leading print and mail companies, providing comprehensive document solutions for public and private sector organisations. We are specialists in communication effectiveness, building customer performance whilst significantly reducing the costs of printing, mailing and postag
Since our creation in 1963, Stewart Signs has been at the forefront of graphic solution production, application, and project management. For over 60 years the core values and vision of Stewart Signs have remained unwavering; We strive to set the standard in the industry by consistently delivering
Acme Bookbinding
Acme Bookbinding is a privately-held and family-owned business. Our 100,000 square foot, state-of-the-art facility is located within metro Boston and services trade printers, publishers, self-publishers and epublishers with binding and the printing of on-demand photobooks and trade books. With
Foster Printing
In 1988, seeing the growing need by the trade for Large Format capability, we purchased the printing assets from Walter Foster Publishing and restructured the plant to meet the needs of the expanding marketplace. Today we spend our time making great impressions for our trade customers (printers / de
.png)
Fine Impressions CyberSecurity News
July 31, 2019 07:00 AM
Cisco to pay $8.6 million fine for selling government hackable surveillance technology
Cisco has agreed to pay $8.6 million to settle a claim it sold video surveillance software it knew was vulnerable to hackers to hospitals,...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Fine Impressions CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Fine Impressions
The official website of Fine Impressions is http://www.fineimpressions.com.
Fine Impressions’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Fine Impressions’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 813, reflecting their Good security posture.
How many security badges does Fine Impressions’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Fine Impressions currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Fine Impressions have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fine Impressions is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Fine Impressions have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fine Impressions does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Fine Impressions comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Fine Impressions is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Fine Impressions have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Fine Impressions does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Fine Impressions comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Fine Impressions is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Fine Impressions have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Fine Impressions is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Fine Impressions
Fine Impressions operates primarily in the Printing Services industry.
Number of Employees at Fine Impressions
Fine Impressions employs approximately 31 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Fine Impressions
Fine Impressions presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Fine Impressions’s LinkedIn Followers
Fine Impressions’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 0 followers.
NAICS Classification of Fine Impressions
Fine Impressions is classified under the NAICS code 323, which corresponds to Printing and Related Support Activities.
Fine Impressions’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Fine Impressions does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Fine Impressions’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Fine Impressions maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fine-impressions.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Fine Impressions
As of December 17, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Fine Impressions has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Fine Impressions has an estimated 5,157 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Fine Impressions ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: ComplyRight, Inc. Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving ComplyRight, Inc. on July 19, 2018. The breach occurred between April 20, 2018 and May 22, 2018, potentially exposing personal information such as names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, and Social Security numbers. The number of individuals affected and whether data was downloaded by unauthorized users remains unknown.
Date Detected: 2018-05-22
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2018-07-19
Type: Data Breach
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COM313072825
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Telephone numbers, Email addresses, Social security numbers
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Names, Addresses, Telephone Numbers, Email Addresses, Social Security Numbers and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach COM313072825
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Telephone numbers, Email addresses, Social security numbers
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COM313072825
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2018-07-19
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2018-07-19.
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2018-05-22.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2018-07-19.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, Social Security numbers and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were addresses, telephone numbers, names, Social Security numbers and email addresses.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is California Office of the Attorney General.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Description
Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Description
SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=fine-impressions' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
