Comparison Overview
Parker Hannifin | Filtration

Parker Hannifin | Filtration
6035 Parkland Blvd, Cleveland, Ohio, 44124, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Key Industries: Aerospace, Food & Beverage, Industrial Manufacturing, Life Sciences, Marine, Off-Highway Mobile, Oil & Gas, Power Generation, Renewable Energy, Transportation, Water Purification, Bioscience, Pharmaceuticals, HVAC and Refrigeration, Metal Processing, Ind...

GRUNDFOS
Poul Due Jensens Vej 7, Bjerringbro, 8850, DK
Last Update: 23/09/2026
We’re a global leader in water solutions. Every day, our intelligent, energy-saving pumps and water solutions help provide comfort, deliver drinking water, remove wastewater or sustain crops all over the world. We want to ensure water is accessible and reliable for all....
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Parker Hannifin | Filtration







GRUNDFOS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parker Hannifin | Filtration in 2026.
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GRUNDFOS in 2026.
Incident History - Parker Hannifin | Filtration (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Parker Hannifin | Filtration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GRUNDFOS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GRUNDFOS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Parker Hannifin | Filtration

GRUNDFOS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.