Comparison Overview
Fushan Technology Vietnam

Fushan Technology Vietnam
VSIP Bac Ninh, Phu Chan, Tu Son Town , VN
Last Update: 09/03/2026
Fushan Technology Vietnam is proud to be a factory of Foxconn - a world’s leading corporation in manufacturing electronic components, telecommunications equipment and computers. Entering service in 2013, the factory was formerly known as Nokia feature phone site, with ...

Sanmina
2700 N 1st St, San Jose, 95134, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Sanmina Corporation (Nasdaq: SANM) is a leading integrated manufacturing solutions provider serving the fastest-growing segments of the global Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS) market. Recognized as a technology leader, Sanmina Corporationprovides end-to-end manu...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fushan Technology Vietnam







Sanmina






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fushan Technology Vietnam in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sanmina in 2026.
Incident History - Fushan Technology Vietnam (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fushan Technology Vietnam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sanmina (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sanmina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fushan Technology Vietnam

Sanmina
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.