Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ROGFID1774708017)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Fido Mobile's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Fido Mobile Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Fido Mobile breach identified under incident ID ROGFID1774708017.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Fido Mobile's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fido-solutions, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 945 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 833 and after the incident was 804 with a difference of -29 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Fido Mobile and their customers.
Rogers Communications recently reported "Rogers and Fido Data Breach Exposing Customer Information", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Rogers Communications and its subsidiary Fido disclosed a data breach after detecting unauthorized access to customer information through internal security monitoring.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names, contact details, account numbers, language preferences.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Investigation and bolstered protections, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure via statement to The Globe and Mail.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Plans to notify impacted customers.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to customer information through internal security monitoring and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating detecting unauthorized access via internal systems (implied). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to internal systems (implied credential misuse). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised data includes names, contact details, account numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach disclosed; scope of affected customers still undetermined and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access via internal systems (cloud storage possible). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of destruction, but breach implies potential misuse. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Fido Mobile Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/fido-solutions/incident/ROGFID1774708017
- Fido Mobile CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/fido-solutions
- Fido Mobile Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/rogfid1774708017-rogers-communications-fido-breach-march-2026/
- Fido Mobile CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/fido-solutions/history
- Fido Mobile CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.iphoneincanada.ca/2026/03/28/rogers-and-fido-confirm-data-breach-affecting-customer-information/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf