Comparison Overview

Fidelity National Financial

VS

Nomura

Fidelity National Financial

601 Riverside Avenue, Building 5, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32204
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fnf.com

Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE: FNF) is a leading provider of title insurance and transaction services to the real estate and mortgage industries. Ranked #359 on the FORTUNE 500(r) list for 2023, FNF is the nation's largest title insurance company through our title insurance underwriters (Fidelity National Title, Chicago Title, Commonwealth Land Title, Alamo Title and National Title Insurance of New York) that collectively issue more title insurance policies than any other title company in the United States. Our mission is to advance, expand, and protect the experience of property ownership by making the safety of our customers our primary focus. We pride ourselves on being extremely customer-oriented, motivated, and quick to provide solutions for all of your title insurance needs. We strongly encourage employee ownership of company stock so our FNF family can share in our company’s continuous growth and be a valuable part of something bigger than themselves.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,380
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Nomura

1-9-1 Nihonbashi, Tokyo, undefined, 103-8645, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nomura.com

Nomura is a global financial services group with an integrated network spanning approximately 30 countries and regions. By connecting markets East & West, Nomura services the needs of individuals, institutions, corporates and governments through its three business divisions: Wealth Management, Investment Management, and Wholesale (Global Markets and Investment Banking). Founded in 1925, the firm is built on a tradition of disciplined entrepreneurship, serving clients with creative solutions and considered thought leadership.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 15,162
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-national-financial.jpeg
Fidelity National Financial
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nomura.jpeg
Nomura
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fidelity National Financial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nomura
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity National Financial in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nomura in 2025.

Incident History — Fidelity National Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity National Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nomura (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nomura cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-national-financial.jpeg
Fidelity National Financial
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2013
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nomura.jpeg
Nomura
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Nomura company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fidelity National Financial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fidelity National Financial company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Nomura company.

In the current year, Nomura company and Fidelity National Financial company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nomura company nor Fidelity National Financial company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fidelity National Financial company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Nomura company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Nomura company nor Fidelity National Financial company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fidelity National Financial company nor Nomura company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fidelity National Financial nor Nomura holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nomura company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fidelity National Financial company.

Fidelity National Financial company employs more people globally than Nomura company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Fidelity National Financial nor Nomura holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fidelity National Financial nor Nomura holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fidelity National Financial nor Nomura holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fidelity National Financial nor Nomura holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fidelity National Financial nor Nomura holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fidelity National Financial nor Nomura holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References