Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fidelity for Wealth ManagersFidelity for Wealth Managers
VS
Fidelity National FinancialFidelity National Financial
Fidelity for Wealth Managers

Fidelity for Wealth Managers

245 Summer St, Boston, 02210, US

Last Update: 27/12/2025

View Profile

Stand out in the future of wealth management. Fidelity powers the growth of wealth management firms to help you be more. We offer clearing and custody services, investment and technology products and solutions, brokerage and trading services, and a range of insights, ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fidelity National Financial

Fidelity National Financial

601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, 32204, US

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fnf.com
738/1000Moderate

Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE: FNF) is a leading provider of title insurance and transaction services to the real estate and mortgage industries. Ranked #313 on the FORTUNE 500(r) list for 2025, FNF is the nation's largest title insurance company through our t...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:20,995
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fidelity for Wealth Managers

Fidelity for Wealth Managers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fidelity National Financial

Fidelity National Financial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity for Wealth Managers in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity National Financial in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fidelity for Wealth Managers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity for Wealth Managers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fidelity National Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity National Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fidelity for Wealth Managers

Fidelity for Wealth Managers

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fidelity National Financial

Fidelity National Financial

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FID823311223
🔒 Incident : Breach
FID959091725
🔒 Incident : Breach
FID027091825

FAQ

Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers and Fidelity National Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers and Fidelity National Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fidelity for Wealth Managers or Fidelity National Financial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fidelity for Wealth Managers or Fidelity National Financial ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers and Fidelity National Financial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fidelity for Wealth Managers and Fidelity National Financial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9