Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fidelity Digital AssetsFidelity Digital Assets
VS
TransamericaTransamerica
Fidelity Digital Assets

Fidelity Digital Assets

N/A

Last Update: 06/01/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

Fidelity Digital Assets—a subsidiary of Fidelity Investments—offers an institutional-grade digital asset experience that incorporates the history, principles, and expertise of Fidelity’s traditional finance business. We are focused on financial innovation in the digital...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Transamerica

Transamerica

Baltimore, Maryland, US, 21202

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.transamerica.com
739/1000Moderate

Longer lifespans are changing the way we exist. Instead of the traditional stages of learn, work, and retire, we now have the potential for a more fulfilling, multi-stage life. With this opportunity comes the need to plan for it. We enable financial professionals, broke...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,465
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fidelity Digital Assets

Fidelity Digital Assets

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transamerica

Transamerica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity Digital Assets in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transamerica in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fidelity Digital Assets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity Digital Assets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transamerica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transamerica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fidelity Digital Assets

Fidelity Digital Assets

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Transamerica

Transamerica

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TRA1043072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRA415072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRA400072625

FAQ

Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets company and Transamerica company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets and Transamerica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets and Transamerica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fidelity Digital Assets or Transamerica ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fidelity Digital Assets or Transamerica ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets and Transamerica, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fidelity Digital Assets and Transamerica, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA