Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®)Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®)
VS
RHB Banking GroupRHB Banking Group
Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®)

Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®)

245 Summer Street, Boston, US

Last Update: 27/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://fcatalyst.com/
757/1000Fair

The Fidelity Center for Applied Technology(FCAT®) is a global team of engineers, developers, designers, researchers, and problem solvers, all driven by a common mission– to catalyze breakthroughs in research and tech to propel Fidelity and our customers into the future....

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RHB Banking Group

RHB Banking Group

Jalan Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY, 50400

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

We are a multinational regional financial services provider that is committed to deliver complete solutions to our clients through differentiated segment offerings and an ecosystem that supports simple, fast and seamless customer experience, underpinned by cohesive and ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:10,832
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®)

Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RHB Banking Group

RHB Banking Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RHB Banking Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RHB Banking Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RHB Banking Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®)

Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RHB Banking Group

RHB Banking Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) company and RHB Banking Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) and RHB Banking Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) and RHB Banking Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) or RHB Banking Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) or RHB Banking Group ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) and RHB Banking Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT®) and RHB Banking Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2