Comparison Overview
Fidelity Bank

Fidelity Bank
3490 Piedmont Road, Atlanta, 30305, US
Last Update: 20/08/2026
The Fidelity Bank Promise: To be the Number One Community Bank with the Best Customer Service in Town. Fidelity Bank is a full service bank owned by Fidelity Southern Corporation (NASDAQ: LION), one of the largest bank holding companies based in Atlanta with $3.8 Bill...

UBS
Postbox, Zurich, CH, 8001
Last Update: 27/07/2026
From gaining new experiences in different roles to acquiring fresh knowledge and skills – at UBS we believe that you should never stop growing and learning because life never stops teaching. We know that it's our people – with their unique backgrounds, skills, experienc...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fidelity Bank







UBS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Fidelity Bank has 45.65% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UBS in 2026.
Incident History - Fidelity Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fidelity Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - UBS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UBS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fidelity Bank

UBS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.