Comparison Overview
Fiba Group

Fiba Group
Esentepe Mah. Büyükdere Caddesi No:175 Ferko Binası A Blok Kat:22 Levent-Şişli / İstanbul, İstanbul, 34330, TR
Last Update: 29/04/2026
With the vision of creating more value for the world, society and people, FIBA Group was founded by Hüsnü Özyeğin in 1987 with Finansbank, the first investment made in the finance sector. In 1990, he gained an international identity with the investment made in the finan...

Koç Holding
Nakkaştepe, Azizbey Sokak No: 1, Istanbul, 34674, TR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Koç Holding is Turkey’s leading investment holding company and Koç Group is Turkey's largest industrial and services group in terms of revenues, exports, number of employees, taxes paid and market capitalization on Borsa Istanbul. Being the only Turkish company to be ra...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fiba Group







Koç Holding






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fiba Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Koç Holding in 2026.
Incident History - Fiba Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fiba Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Koç Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Koç Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fiba Group

Koç Holding
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.