Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FEV EVA GmbHFEV EVA GmbH
VS
Volvo GroupVolvo Group
FEV EVA GmbH

FEV EVA GmbH

Heidemannstraße 41a, München, Bayern, DE, 80939

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://fev-eva.com/
748/1000Moderate

DIE FEV GRUPPE FEV ist ein global führender Entwicklungsdienstleister im Automobilsektor und Innovationstreiber für unterschiedliche Industriezweige. Professor Franz Pischinger legte dafür den Grundstein, indem er seinen akademischen und technischen Hintergrund mit sein...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:340
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Volvo Group

Volvo Group

Gropegårdsgatan 2, Göteborg, SE, 417 15

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
292/1000Critical

The Volvo Group is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of trucks, buses, construction equipment and marine and industrial engines. The Group also provides complete solutions for financing and service. The Volvo Group, with its headquarters in Gothenburg, employs ab...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:78,332
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FEV EVA GmbH

FEV EVA GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Volvo Group

Volvo Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FEV EVA GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Volvo Group has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - FEV EVA GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FEV EVA GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Volvo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FEV EVA GmbH

FEV EVA GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Volvo Group

Volvo Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CONVOL1770724357
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
VOL2832328091725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
VOL2892928092525

FAQ

Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH company and Volvo Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH and Volvo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH and Volvo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FEV EVA GmbH or Volvo Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FEV EVA GmbH or Volvo Group ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH and Volvo Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FEV EVA GmbH and Volvo Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA