Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FerrovialFerrovial
VS
GHDGHD
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

Amsterdam, NL

Last Update: 04/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ferrovial.com
809/1000Good

Ferrovial is a leading global infrastructure company transforming highways, airports, and energy around the world. Its distinctive integrated business model supports the entire lifecycle of complex projects, from design and financing to construction, operation and maint...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:12,658
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GHD

GHD

133 Castlereagh St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ghd.com
790/1000Fair

We are committed to addressing the world’s biggest challenges in the areas of water, energy and communities. GHD is a global network of multi-disciplinary professionals providing clients with integrated solutions through engineering, environmental, design and construct...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:16,813
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GHD

GHD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrovial in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GHD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ferrovial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrovial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GHD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GHD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GHD

GHD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ferrovial company and GHD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ferrovial and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ferrovial and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ferrovial or GHD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ferrovial or GHD ?
Between Ferrovial and GHD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ferrovial and GHD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9